CyberHostUK - Web Hosting Forum & Community Discussion Board
News: Welcome to the all new CyberHostUK Web Hosting Discussion Forums!
 
*
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. July 30, 2010, 03:09:38 PM


Login with username, password and session length


Pages: [1]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Why you should always use :fail: instead of :blackhole:  (Read 1721 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
CyberHostUK Tim
CyberHostUK
Administrator
New Member
*****

Karma: 1
Posts: 43



WWW
« on: July 31, 2007, 11:30:49 PM »

There is a great article on why you should always use :fail: instead of :blackhole:

Please take a look at it HERE and use this thread for discussion and to share your comments on the article.
Logged

Kind regards,

Tim
CyberHostUK Founder & Managing Director
AlexV
New Member
*

Karma: 0
Posts: 1


« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2007, 08:24:33 AM »

Interesting, but it doesn't tell you *where* you should be using :fail:. If, for example, you wanted to keep your catch-all alias, but define specific aliases to fail, do you still get the same benefits described in the article if you use forwarders, or filtering? Neither of those mention :fail:as a valid destination, Filtering mentions Discard, and Forwarders nothing at all.

Adding a forwarder to :fail: for an alias does seem to work, in that mail sent to that address fails, but I don't know if the benefits denying the email before it even reaches the server, or denying the IP address after 4 wrong attempts.

Incidentally, is that a permanent ban of IP address? That seems a bit dangerous, what with dynamic IP addresses, joe-jobs, NAT, proxies and other reasons an IP address might be evil one day, but not the next.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.7 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC

Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS! Dilber MC Theme by HarzeM